Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Frayed Knot

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    64,745
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    30

 Content Type 

Profiles

New York Mets News, Rumors & Analysis

New York Mets Videos

2026 New York Mets Top Prospect Rankings

New York Mets Trade & Free Agent Rumors

New York Mets Fan Guides & Resources

2026 New York Mets Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Frayed Knot

  1. Niese - 3.4 Clippard - 0.4 Granderson - 3.5 Uribe - 1.0 Murphy - 1.0 Tejada - 0.5 Plawecki - 0.2
  2. Harvey - 4.5 Familia - 0.8 Robles - 0.5 CTorres - 0.5 Flores - 3.4 Clippard - 0.3
  3. Chad Ochoseis wrote: After that, even though just in his 4th ML season, he can NOT be offered arbitration by his current team nor can the team make a qualifying offer to him (plus the mid-season trade took care of that anyway) so this is a 60 game trial run. Can sign him to a FA contract this winter of course but so can everyone else. But http://www.blessyouboys.com/2015/7/31/9077995/yoenis-cespedes-trade-mets-tigers says The team that releases Cespedes is not eligible to sign him until May 15, 2016, according to FOX Sports' Ken Rosenthal. Given Cespedes' desire to test the free agent market, this makes it unlikely that the Mets will be able to re-sign him after the season. So, am I reading this correctly? If Cespedes hits 30 home runs over the remainder of the season and both Wilpons hit the lottery, we still can't offer him $500 million during the off-season to make him a Met until the zombie apocalypse, because he can't re-sign with us until about the 35th game of 2016? Meaning that it's nearly a foregone conclusion that Cespedes will not be a Met next year? I certainly didn't know that. Wondering now if that's something which is unique to Cespedes's contract or if there was some recent change where non-tendering a player (which is essentially what the Mets would be doing to Cespedes even though forced to do it) means you're out of the FA game for that guy until six weeks into the following season in what I can only assume is an attempt to prevent clubs from trying to pull an off-season end-run around the 20% cut rule. Probably the latter cuz I can't figure out why it would be specific to Cespedes.
  4. Wilmer winning all these fans by crying on the field reminds me of the scene from the ODD COUPLE (movie, not tv) where Felix start crying about his ex-wife and the Pidgeon sisters fall all over him. Felix is convinced he did the wrong thing by not looking manly, but Oscar just sees the result and said: "I'm considering getting hysterical"
  5. And we're already winning the Carlos Gomez trade!!
  6. Man these MF'ers foul off a ton of pitches. I wish they'd just do what we do and K on three pitches in the dirt.
  7. 6.1 IP off the non-elite portion of their bullpen: 1 bloop single
  8. Uggla anywhere is a step back. Zimmerman in the OF doesn't matter because we haven't hit one to the OF in about six innings.
  9. Harper gets pissed off every time he doesn't homer. You can see it in his face as he runs out grounders or each time he just gets under one.
  10. What as ASS!!!! Not only was it a strike but if you want to be an **MLB STAR** Bryce you can't get yourself throw out in the 11th inning.
  11. Fman99 wrote: That was some play by Robles! WOW. I thought we were about to see another inning set up by an incredibly cheapo single.
  12. We already scored one today.
  13. Not a question of fearing him, it's one of using him when he got the best chance to do some damage. In that case, unless Duda HRs, you then need a hit or probably consecutive hits from Johnson & Grandy vs an LHP
  14. So it's Cespedes for the rest-a-des ... year. After that, even though just in his 4th ML season, he can NOT be offered arbitration by his current team nor can the team make a qualifying offer to him (plus the mid-season trade took care of that anyway) so this is a 60 game trial run. Can sign him to a FA contract this winter of course but so can everyone else. This deal also means he'll be on his 4th team in the previous 366 days (assuming he suits up by tomorrow). A year ago today he was traded from Oakland to Boston who took an instant dislike to him and dealt him to Detroit in the off-season. But for right now he hits, he fields, he throws, he runs a bit but rarely walks and our OF and lineup just got a bit better. Now let's get Wright, Cuddyer, Matz & Blevins back and take the fuckin' division.
  15. The time to use Duda was in the middle innings when the bases were loaded and Gio just pulled. If Terry went to him there w/bases empty and 2 outs the Nats would have just gone to their LOOGY Thorton to face Duda and the two lefties behind him: Johnson & Grandy.
  16. And another thrilling inning of failing to get a ball out of the infield vs middle relievers. Six straight batters and no one has hit one farther than I can throw a rolled-up newspaper.
  17. I thought he'd be a good platoon half for the 4th/5th OF spot - and if he had hit anywhere near his career OPS (734) he would have. But instead he threw up (pun intended) the worst season of his career by a long shot (an absurd 545 OPS) to the point where his LHP splits were worse than his career vs RHP numbers and for a guy with large split differentials that's not a good sign. It's not like he didn't get his chances either, he started every game vs a LHP plus got his share of PH ABs as well. And the really worst part is that he was the better of the two OF backups.
  18. Frayed Knot wrote: Frayed Knot wrote: I'd like to think that with tow half-innings left to score against their one that the advantage is with us but I don't think the bullpen situation is. Personally I'd prefer to stick with Clip-Art for the 9th no matter what the score is except that he threw 34 pitches to Werth alone. On the other hand the Nats go with Barrett rather than one of their three-headed closers. On the other other hand we don't hit middling relievers either.
  19. Frayed Knot wrote: I'd like to think that with tow half-innings left to score against their one that the advantage is with us but I don't think the bullpen situation is. Personally I'd prefer to stick with Clip-Art for the 9th no matter what the score is except that he threw 34 pitches to Werth alone. On the other hand the Nats go with Barrett rather than one of their three-headed closers.
  20. I'd like to think that with tow half-innings left to score against their one that the advantage is with us but I don't think the bullpen situation is. Personally I'd prefer to stick with Clip-Art for the 9th no matter what the score is except that he threw 34 pitches to Werth alone.
  21. Flores's first play of the game makes Yunel Escobar cry.
  22. Gerardo Parra >>>> Orioles Pitching prospect Zach Davies >>>> Brewers
  23. d'Kong76 wrote: I knew there had to Mets' ties to that lion story. It's a metaphor. The lion in this case is us fans being led away from our sanctuary by promises of better things (food in the lion's case, outfielders who can actually hit in ours) only to be shot to pieces as soon as we dared to hope. The hunter/dentist is Sandy but the real villains here are the corrupt game wardens (representing Fred & Jeff of course) who were not just the hunter's accomplices but in fact set up the whole phony hunt in the first place and then cleverly made him the fall guy when things all went wrong. The travel guide is played by Jay Horowitz who was unable to prevent the story from getting out.
  24. I'm surprised no one has brought up the most Mets-ian scenario of them all: We trade for Justin Upton but wind up missing out on the post-season by one game ... yesterday's game.
×
×
  • Create New...