From the Chass piece For some reason, the news media have not talked about the former catcher and steroids the way they have talked about Bonds, Clemens and Sosa. When I worked for The New York Times, I tried more than once to write about Piazza and steroids, but the baseball editor said I couldn�t because his name hadn�t been linked to steroids. I can link his name to steroids, I countered, but I had to wait until I started this Web site to talk about Piazza�s acne-covered back, a generally accepted telltale sign of steroids use. Piazza�s passionate fans ridiculed me for that assertion (and surely will again) and ignored the fact that Piazza�s back cleared up as soon as baseball began testing for steroids. A book for which Simon & Schuster paid Piazza an advance of $800,000 or $750,000 had been scheduled for publication next month, but there�s talk about a delay because of a dispute between the publisher and Piazza over the subject of steroids and their presence in the book. The Hall of Fame wouldn�t look too good if Piazza were elected next week, and then his book came out with his admission that he used steroids. But maybe the Hall doesn�t care about Steroids. This was a headline on its Web site the other day: For some reason???? So, he is indicating that Piazza is going to drop a steroid blockbuster is his book? It's Murray Chass, I know.