They haven't updated for 2010 yet, but here is a sample using Henry Blanco. On the site, if you hover over the number, it gives the team and years the uni number was used. Nice feature.
Nymr83 wrote: wasnt Igarashi given a 2 year deal? that alone likely jumps him onto the roster ahead of Calero and maybe Misch (Misch stays if there isnt another viable long man) Igarashi can have the spot taken by Parnell or Misch...but each of those 2 have had better springs. There are a couple of viable long men in the bullpen other than Misch. Nymr83 wrote: On edit: If Reyes isn't ready by opening day, then Tejada should ride some pine...but I bet Jose will be ready I strongly disagree with this. If Tejada (or Fernando Martinez, or Ike Davis) isn't going to play every day (or at least start 5 times a week) I don't want them on the roster, I'd rather have them playing every day in Buffalo. "riding the pine" isn't where i want my top prospects. I guess you'd prefer Jacobs?
This is how I see the roster going north right now: SP1: Johan Santana (L) SP2: Mike Pelfrey ® SP3: Oliver Perez (L) SP4: John Maine ® SP5: Nelson Figueroa ® CL: Francisco Rodriguez ® RP: Pedro Feliciano (L) RP: Hisanori Takahashi (L) RP: Kiko Calero ® RP: Pat Misch ® RP: Fernando Nieve ® RP: Bobby Parnell ® CF: Angel Pagan (S) 2B: Luis Castillo (S) SS: Jose Reyes (S) 3B: David Wright ® LF: Jason Bay ® 1B: Daniel Murphy (L) RF: Jeff Francoeur® C: Rod Barajas ® C: Henry Blanco ® INF: Alex Cora (L) OF: Gary Matthews Jr. (S) UTL: Fernando Tatis ® UTL: Chris Carter (L) I'd let Parnell, Nieve, Misch and Takahashi know that they are in the bullpen auditioning for a starting job should any of Figueroa, Maine, Perez or Pelfrey falter. I really don't mind our lineup, bench and bullpen...but that rotation is going to do us in. Didn't we say that in December? On edit: If Reyes isn't ready by opening day, then Tejada should ride some pine...but I bet Jose will be ready.
It's really just me mouthing off. I don't have anything against Stewart, I just don't think she is anything to write home about as an actress. In my mind's eye, the Runaways movie I would want to see would be cast with a group of unknown teenage actresses who are preferably punk-rawkish and hopefully, genuinely love the Runaways. I think casting two under-20 "it" girls and billing their names above the movie title on the poster goes against anything that the Runaways ever were about. But, from what I hear, Joan Jett herself was invovled with production, so who am I to say anything.
I think FMart should start at AAA. But once Beltran gets back, GMJ, Pagan and even Francoeur should be put on alert that they could lose time or jobs to FMart.
I guess I don't share the same affinity for her part in Adventureland that others on this board have. I thought she made a pretty bad movie worse. I don't think she particularly looks like Joan Jett and she was born a decade after the Runaways were even around. I am of the opinion that the only reason she (and Dakota Fanning) are in this movie is to sell it to teens. Which is fine...it's the Hollywood way. But I'm not expecting any notable performances from the cast. I'm sure the costumes, makeup and, of course, the music will be great.