It has been called selective memory, but it gets deeper than that. About 25 years ago I worked with someone who, while a student at Notre Dame, developed a mathematical model of a dog. Part of that led him into a model of learning and memory that was applicable to the human brain. From what I remember, he theorized that as we learn things, they first stay in a place in memory for rapid recall (like cache in a computer). Then, as more things are experienced, those memories are pushed farther and farther back into consciousness. If something happens that forces the person to think of them again, they are moved back into "cache". So, in a baseball sense, "clutch" plays are remembered, then pushed back as more games are experienced. But a discussion of "clutch" forces the recall of the situations that the rememberer had filed under "clutch". The same plays are recalled, but not other instances where the player might have failed. Again, selectively remembering certain instances and not remembering the failures that may have put them into perspective. And that seems to be what the writers have done. Follow up. I haven't been in contact with that person since then. But I know that before I worked with him, after graduating from Notre Dame, the person played professional football and received a Law Degree. (insert lawyer joke here) Then, about ten years ago, I learned from someone who works at the FBI that my prior associate was "moving up fast on the "10 Most Wanted" list, but he didn't go into any details about the offense he committed. Later