Jesse put Doug under the WAR microscope last week, with commentary by yours truly here. According to WAR, the lowest-rated player of the live ball era is Doug Flynn, who hit .238 with a .266 on-base percentage and .294 slugging percentage from 1975-85 with the Reds, Mets, Rangers, Expos and Tigers. There's no getting around the fact that Flynn's .560 career OPS is the fourth-worst in the majors since 1920 among players with at least 3,000 plate appearances, or that he was just 20-for-40 stealing bases. But would Flynn's teams, particularly the late 1970s and early 1980s Mets, really have been better off employing a revolving cast of minor-league call-ups? "I have an overwhelmingly positive association with Doug Flynn, mainly for his fielding," says Greg Prince, the author of the book "Faith and Fear in Flushing" and co-author of the blog of the same name. "Probably, along with Edgardo Alfonzo, the best defensive second baseman the Mets ever had, and from the vantage point of a 17-year-old, seemed like a good guy, and the kind of guy in those lean days I always rooted for. As a middle infielder who didn't hit a lot, he certainly did his job, to the point where he won a Gold Glove (in 1980). Nobody blamed Doug Flynn for the fact that the Mets weren't going anywhere in those days."