Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

IGT 04/28 - Mets (time to rock) the Nats


Recommended Posts

Posted


We had Scherzer in least partial pitch-count danger (more than 5 innings worth of pitches in 4 IP) but pretty much just put him back on track with a 1-2-3 inning on six pitches.


  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Hot damn, deGrom looks filthy


Posted


There's this historical belief, that I think is overstated, which holds that Ron Darling was a good pitcher, but anytime that Gooden and Fernandez or Gooden and Cone or Gooden and Viola or Cone and Viola or Gooden and Saberhagen or whoever weren't available, Darling could never step up and BE the #1 pitcher.

Like I said, I think it's been overstated, although Darling has said as much himself, but I'm kind of digging in a big way that deGrom is doing this with Syndergaard questionable and Harvey grinding and the Mets on the skids of late.

Stay gold, deGromowitz.


Guest cooby
Guests
Posted (edited)


.


Edited by Guest
Guest cooby
Guests
Posted


cooby wrote:
Please include Sid


Posted


Ronnie has a tendency to overdo the 'I wasn't that good' angle about his own career.
It's an easy trap for announcers to fall into and maybe my one complaint about his style is that he should do that less often.


Posted


Nice catch by Grandy but I would have felt a whole lot better with Lagares out there chasing it.
Terry could have PH'd Lagares last inning for Grandy after they IW'd Walker but Dusty would have instantly switched to the RH Blanton anyway.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Safe. Let's pack on a few runzzzz here


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Whaddaya say, Wecky.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Well that was a shit ab from Cabrera


Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:
Ronnie has a tendency to overdo the 'I wasn't that good' angle about his own career.
It's an easy trap for announcers to fall into and maybe my one complaint about his style is that he should do that less often.


This is a problem that has never plagued Keith Hernandez.

7-3 Good Guys.


Posted


Edgy MD wrote:
Who is this dude in Zimmerman's clothes?


Yeah, anyone who had THAT in the pool come collect your winnings.
15 HRs last year in 450 ABs. 10 now in less than 80


Guest Rockin' Doc
Guests
Posted


I just got in from the local beer garden and tried to tune into the game. MLB has once again decided that I am within the local blackout area for theis game. I'm over 500 miles from freakin' CitiField. They will never sucker me into paying for MLB.com again. I'm blocked for over half of the Mets home games.

oh....Let's Go Mets!!!!


Posted


Chad Ochoseis wrote:
I'm more worried about the dude in Reed's clothes.


I'm worried that the one in Familia's clothes now has a smaller margin to work with.
He's been walking too many so far in a small sample.


Posted


Rockin' Doc wrote:
I just got in from the local beer garden and tried to tune into the game. MLB has once again decided that I am within the local blackout area for theis game. I'm over 500 miles from freakin' CitiField.


That's about being within the Nats' zone, not the Mets', no?


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


I really expected Werth to jack one there.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Terryble result for that pitching change. Cabrera could have made this all unnecessary


Guest Rockin' Doc
Guests
Posted


Chad Ochoseis wrote:
Rockin' Doc wrote:
I just got in from the local beer garden and tried to tune into the game. MLB has once again decided that I am within the local blackout area for theis game. I'm over 500 miles from freakin' CitiField.


That's about being within the Nats' zone, not the Mets', no?


Probably, just getting home and signing in, I had forgotten that this series was in Washington. However, I was blocked from mosrt of the recent Atlanta series at CitiField.


Posted


Rockin' Doc wrote:
I just got in from the local beer garden and tried to tune into the game. MLB has once again decided that I am within the local blackout area for theis game. I'm over 500 miles from freakin' CitiField. They will never sucker me into paying for MLB.com again. I'm blocked for over half of the Mets home games.


Is this MLB.TV?
What I suspect is that they've decided you're within the Nationals 'home' area and so you're blocked that way.

You should be able to find out which teams you're blocked for when you sign up for that service.
I figure for you it would just be the Braves but some areas "overlap" and you can get two or more on the no-go list. That both are division rivals for the Mets just makes it worse since that's 38 games right there.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...