Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • 4 months later...
Posted


Didn't like it at all. The evolution of the Daniel Craig Bond has me at a loss. Gone is the smooth, sophisticated, womanizing Bond and in is this cross between some Bourne-Jason Statham-Mission Impossible character. Maybe it's Paul Haggis doing the writing and not-so-much Craig as the actor.


  • 4 months later...
Posted


Just saw in on DVD. Really awful. It's not so much that Bond is bad (there have been bad Bonds before) but the direction was horrible. One chase scene after another and it was impossible to keep track of who was chasing who, or if one shot was either the chaser or the chasee.

And Bond is a real prick. He uses his best friend -- the only one who was willing to go out on a limb for him -- as a human shield. Is that how Bond says "thanks"?


Posted


RealityChuck wrote:

And Bond is a real prick. He uses his best friend -- the only one who was willing to go out on a limb for him -- as a human shield. Is that how Bond says "thanks"?


and thats not the Bond I know, Brosnan's character or Clooney's aren't doing something like that.


Posted


Nymr83 wrote:
RealityChuck wrote:

And Bond is a real prick. He uses his best friend -- the only one who was willing to go out on a limb for him -- as a human shield. Is that how Bond says "thanks"?


and thats not the Bond I know, Brosnan's character or Clooney's aren't doing something like that.


Clooney?

I could see Dalton doing that.


Posted


i wasnt very awake when i wrote that, i meant to say connery not clooney


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...