The CPF and Mets Winning

[MFS62]

Do you think the CPF is different when the Mets are winning rather than losing?
How so?

Later

[Elster88]

Choices 3 and 4 are the same, no?

[metirish]

More fun, although there could be other reasons why things are more fun around here...

[Guest Yancy Street Gang]

I think it's been more fun, but for the other reasons that Irish hinted at.

And like Elster, I can't see the difference between the third and fourth choice.

[Elster88]

I went with #3. The Mets' winning has nothing to do with the level of fun around here.

I was having a particularly miserable time posting here when they were 10-2.

[MFS62]

Yancy, 88,
When I was coming up with the questions, I thought there might be a scenario that while things around here could be the same in terms of amount of participation and viewpoint, there would be a certain edge to the writing. That translates to me as not having as much fun.

That was sort of based on a comment a while ago that there didn't seem to be as much participation in POTG voting in games the Mets had lost.

Vote your conscience.

Later

[Guest Edgy DC]

More Karate Kid material is a good thing, and I guess more winining leads to more being a position to sweep the other teams legs, which triggers more Karate Kid material.

Do you have a problem with that, Mister?

[MFS62]

Edgy DC wrote: Do you have a problem with that, Mister?

(bowing)
No, Sensei.

Later

[Guest Hillbilly]

Back in the olden' days the best writing contributions came when good Met teams played badly (circa 1998-2000).

IGTs are more fun when the Mets are winning. That much seems clear.

[Guest KC]

I don't think the CPF funometer is any higher or lower with respect to the
win / loss record. Bitching and complaining about the Mets is fun and en-
joying their success with ya'll is fun.

The posters here are a lot more objective here than some other posters think,
but I'm covering old stale ground there.