Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

mets get delgado (apparently)


metsmarathon

mets get delgado (apparently)  

9 members have voted

  1. 1. mets get delgado (apparently)

    • I love the Delgado trade!
      9


Recommended Posts

Posted


Great short-term deal. We might make the playoffs a few times.

However:

This might be bad long-term. Jake-Monster could become the next Jeff Bagwell, and Petit is as sure-fire a prospect as they come, and he'll likely be a #2 starter. So I'm iffy on this deal.


  • Replies 256
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted


Valadius wrote:
Jake-Monster could become the next Jeff Bagwell, and Petit is as sure-fire a prospect as they come, and he'll likely be a #2 starter.


*sigh*

Where to begin?
_____________________________
AN ALMIGHTY 119) KEVIN ELSTER POST


Posted


I think Jacobs is a nice player, but it's unlikely he's going to become a superstar or even an All-Star, unless the Marlins get so bad that he's their token player.

And no pitching prospect is a sure thing. You're too young to remember Tim Leary, but you've probably heard of Paul Wilson and Bill Pulsipher.


Posted


I remember Wilson and Pulsipher. However, I am too young to remember the full extent of the hype surrounding them. I only caught the tail end, when people were already doubting them.


Guest sharpie
Guests
Posted


Take Petit and triple it, that was the hype surrounding Wilson and Pulsipher.


Guest HappyRecap
Guests
Posted


He said that Delgado has the option to demand a trade after next year. So if he is a one-year deal, let's see how he does.

Will be interesting to see how he spins his new love of NY now that he is playing here.


Posted


And if he demands a trade, he risks forfeiting his big guaranteed contract if he doesn't get it.

I don't think his right to demand a trade is any kind of factor at all. As long as nobody speaks Spanish to him, he should be happy in New York.


Posted


You're killing me HappyRecap. I also fail to recall him saying something like "I don't like New York." The thrust of his argument seemed to be that he thought Florida had a better chance to win. Leiter pissing in his ear probably didn't help.

Why the hate for Delgado? So far everything you've said seems to be more grounded in rumor and speculation than anything else
_____________________________
AN ALMIGHTY 119) KEVIN ELSTER POST


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Take Petit and triple it, and that was the hype surrounding Pulsipher alone. Maybe. Triple it again for the three guys at once.

]IJake-Monster could become the next Jeff Bagwell, and Petit is as sure-fire a prospect as they come, and he'll likely be a #2 starter.

I think that second part is somewhat inherently contradictory. As "sure-fire" as you say he is you're still projecting him for probably #2 status, which is hardly a consensus projection.

I hate trading any young talent also. Even more than you probably.


Guest Johnny Dickshot
Guests
Posted




He's always happy.


Posted


Regardless, with Delgado on board, it focuses our attention on the catcher and second base positions, and to a lesser extent right field.


Posted


Diaz is our right fielder,Hernandez will be the catcher, Matsui at second...

Reyes
Beltran
Wright
Delgado
Floyd
Diaz
Hernandez
Matsui
Pitcher


Posted


Yes Yancy so true, I screwed up that a few times last season with two Hernandezes in the squad...probably drives you nuts..still not a reason to not make this trade ..


Guest HappyRecap
Guests
Posted


Elster,

Here is my position...I don't have anything against Delgado but I hate getting players like him that are 5 minutes past their prime since the Mets have a huge history of getting guys like that. And if he has an okay year, we then have to watch his numbers decline on the back side of his contract where he looks more and more overpaid.

There hasn't been one signing or trade of a stud player in his prime that has panned out since Piazza. And that includes Beltran based on his off year last year so based on this history getting excited about Delgado in November is hard to do.

I also understand that this is NY and the Mets can't rebuild with youth all over the field. They also are starting their own network and you need the fans to see name players out there on the field, hence signing top-flight talent even if in two years it is a bad deal.

And the other part of my no-Delgado stance is that I liked Jacobs from what I saw. Others point out that he was a failed catcher without a position but guys Torre, Biggio and Zeile all had very good careers after they found another position. And Jacobs at 1B wasn't like the Piazza debacle of two years ago.

So that is where I stand...if he comes in and gets the job done and isn't some malcontent, fine, but I would have preferred to have given Jacobs a shot.

HAPPY RECAP


Guest Spacemans Bong
Guests
Posted


Matsui will not be 2B. The Mets can't leave a gaping hole there.


Posted


"Jake-Monster could become the next Jeff Bagwell"

Very, very, VERY unlikely.
And did I mention that it's very unlikely?



"and Petit is as sure-fire a prospect as they come"

No he isn't. I'm betting that there'll be at least a dozen or more pitchers rated more highly on the lists that'll come out this winter.



One of the problems I believe fans (and others) have with deciding to deal or keep prospects is that they fail to distinguish amongst prospects. M&MD were knocking Milledge yesterday, for instance, by citing past minor leaguers who haven't made it without any sense of perspective about him in particular. It's as if every player with the letters 'P-R-O-S-P-E-C-T' stamped on his forehead is created equal and which ones to bet on or not is something that's a total crapshoot (shirley something they wouldn't say about college football draftees btw).

Both Petit & Jacobs could turn out to be good players, but the above claims are unlike you'll see anyone with knowledge of their careers to date make. Not even close.


Guest heep
Guests
Posted


We traded quality, young talent for a 34 year old slugger you did not want to play for us.

Bottom line.

The only real positive is that it prevents us from trading Milledge.

I hate that they traded Jacobs. Watch him win rookie of the year next year, and Petit go on to be a great ML pitcher.

I am very ambivilent to this trade. Win - now. Never liked tha idea.

Add Zambrano to Delgado as they guys I do not like, and Kazmir, Jacobs, and Petit as the ones that foolishly got away.

Jeffy Wilpon at it again.


Guest Rotblatt
Guests
Posted


Not bad. We probably did overpay--I think Petit was too much--but all in all, I'm happy with this.


Guest heep
Guests
Posted


typo

WE TRADED QUALITY YOUNG TALENT FOR A PLAYER WHO DID NOT WANT TO PLAY FOR US.

bottom line.

The mets: always trying to assemble and not build.

f delgado. Jacobs was our guy.


Posted


"Jeffy Wilpon at it again."

And Jeff had what to do with this deal exactly?
- Is there a particular "type" of deal that has a JW stamp on it, or do we have specific info here?
- Or are we just taking a shot at the convienient target because we don't like it?


Posted


Happy,

I misjudged your argument. It makes a lot more sense when you put it the way you did just now. You and heep seem to represent the ideology that the younger players will turn out better then the older proven hitters (though Beltran is not old enough to be of use in your argument, IMO) that they are traded for. I'm of the belief that Delgado is not over the hill and that Jacobs is not guaranteed to even be half as good as Delgado will be for the next three years (more in line with the TITTS ideology, coined by Norrin [i think]). Only time will tell.

IMO, a lot of Met fans have to get over the failures of Robbie Alomar and Mo Vaughn (going on three years ago), and realize that not every batter brought into Shea will fail to hit at their career norms.
_____________________________
AN ALMIGHTY 119) KEVIN ELSTER POST


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


]I hate that they traded Jacobs. Watch him win rookie of the year next year, and Petit go on to be a great ML pitcher.

This thread --- or its clone --- just made the prediction archives.

]I am very ambivilent to this trade. Win - now. Never liked tha idea.

You sound far beyound ambivalent.


Posted


]M&MD were knocking Milledge yesterday


Is MD still calling him Lance Milledge? I think M gave up on correcting him every time.
_____________________________
AN ALMIGHTY 119) KEVIN ELSTER POST


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...