Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted January 11 Posted January 11 In Babe Ruth's 60 HR season he faced 64 different pitchers.Cal Raleigh faced 303.
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted January 11 Posted January 11 Thanks to Raleigh, Ruth also faced fewer throat irritants.[fimg=600]https://metsrostercentral.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/1_0112812985efee61909125a061eab11c.jpg[/fimg]
whippoorwill Old-Timey Member Posted January 11 Posted January 11 In Babe Ruth's 60 HR season he faced 64 different pitchers.Cal Raleigh faced 303. It would be an interesting research project to see how many pitchers were rostered that year
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted January 11 Author Posted January 11 In Babe Ruth's 60 HR season he faced 64 different pitchers.Cal Raleigh faced 303. It would be an interesting research project to see how many pitchers were rostered that year Philadelphia Athletics used 15 pitchers in 1927Washington Nationals = 16Detroit Tigers = 14Chicago White Sox = 10 (to pitch 153 games/1,367 innings!!)Cleveland Indians = 15St Louis Browns = 14Boston Red Sox = 14So that's only 98 pitchers that Ruth could have possibly faced that year.The 2025 Mets used 46
whippoorwill Old-Timey Member Posted January 12 Posted January 12 The 2025 Mets used 46 Most of them shouldn’t have been there
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted January 14 Author Posted January 14 The 2025 Mets used 46 Most of them shouldn’t have been there Well, if the of the pitchers who should have been there actually were there then a chunk of those 46 wouldn't have been needed.btw, of those 64 pitchers that Babe faced back 99 seasons ago, he homered off of more than half of them (33).Obviously that means he took various guys deep multiple times with two poor souls leading the parade at four taters served up each.Boston wound up being the team victimized most often (11) that year ... because of course they were.Final note: one thing I noticed in flipping through the box scores for the Yanx in that '27 season is that they just bludgeoned opponents on a daily basis. 110-41 (and one tie) was their record for the year (plus 4-0 in the WS) and a 975 to 599 RS/RA gap, or right about a 1.63/1 ratio.They were more than 200 runs scored better than lg avg and 131 ahead of the second place club. In runs allowed they were 157 below the lg avg and let up 103 fewer than the runner up.If that kind of dominance has been bettered over an entire season by anyone in any year in MLB I'd be very surprised.
MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted January 14 Posted January 14 I had heard that in that 1927 season, Ruth outhomered every other TEAM.Did your research verify that?Later
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted January 14 Posted January 14 In runs allowed they were 157 below the lg avg and let up 103 fewer than the runner up. That's amazing for a club that was known for (more like defined by) their offense. Urban Shocker and Waite Hoyt apparently were more than just a pair of cool names.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted January 14 Author Posted January 14 I had heard that in that 1927 season, Ruth outhomered every other TEAM.Did your research verify that? Yup! And probably a couple other seasons in the early '20s as well.NYY = 158 (Ruth + Gehrig = 107)PHA = 56SLB = 55DET = 51CHW = 36WAS = 29BOS = 28CLE = 26This means that the NYY other than Ruth & Gehrig out-homered more than half of their opponents.Also: Cleveland all year = 26; Ruth in September = 17In the NL, the Giants (109), Cards (84), and Cubs (74) out-HR'd G.H.R. that year.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now