MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted October 7, 2025 Author Posted October 7, 2025 They prefer "name" players to kids. They've been doing it since the 1962 team. They thought it was a way to win quickly and draw fans to a new team. It is a tactical approach rather than strategically building for the future.Sometimes it works.Sometimes it doesn't.Later
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted October 7, 2025 Posted October 7, 2025 Who is this "they" that you refer to?The implication is you believe that every NYM decision maker over the past 60+ years operates under one long continuously unchanging philosophy.
MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted October 7, 2025 Author Posted October 7, 2025 Who is this "they" that you refer to?The implication is you believe that every NYM decision maker over the past 60+ years operates under one long continuously unchanging philosophy. That's not what I meant. Certainly not an organizational philosophy, but an occasional approach based on the GM. George Weiss certainly did. And I think Stearns does it, too. Conversely, Frank Cashen meticulously built a minor league organization(down to procedure manuals describing what a player does in a situation for all levels of the organization) to provide a pipeline of talent. He acquired players based on ability and potential (e.g.- Hojo) rather than big names. Looking back, the only "Big name" he acquired was Keith. And he shed Kingman and Foster.Later
Zach Thornton Syracuse Mets - AAA LHP On Sunday, the southpaw tossed five shutout innings as the bulk pitcher. He gave up 2 hits, walked 2 and had 5 strikeouts. Explore Zach Thornton News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now