Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

IGT 4/17/2018: WAS@NYM -- Zack Attack


Recommended Posts

Grand Central Contributor
Posted


what's his patent number for these hot streaks?

I mean, everyone's streaky.since 2016, Conforto and Cespedes have had better hit streaks. TJ Rivera has had similar streaks. As has Rene Rivera, James Loney, Juan Lagares and Jose Reyes. Asdrubal Cabrera has had three.

So yes, a professional baseball player is capable of having a hot streak and providing a lot of offense during it. That doesn't make him not the 5th best OF on the Mets.


  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest 41Forever
Guests
Posted


Last year Bruce had 36 homers -- tied for 15th in the majors -- and 101 RBI, tied for 18th best. That doesn't suck.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


41Forever wrote:
Last year Bruce had 36 homers -- tied for 15th in the majors -- and 101 RBI, tied for 18th best. That doesn't suck.


RBIs mean nothing in player evaluation, and the HR are nice but he still made more than average amount of outs to counter that one skill.


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


Ceetar wrote:
RBIs mean nothing in player evaluation

Until you need a few, down a run in the bottom of eighth, in a real game.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


d'Kong76 wrote:
Ceetar wrote:
RBIs mean nothing in player evaluation

Until you need a few, down a run in the bottom of eighth, in a real game.


And there are roughly 100 better ways to pick the player you want to come up in that situation than RBI.


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


Roughly.

Bruce > sucks


Guest 41Forever
Guests
Posted


Ceetar wrote:
41Forever wrote:
Last year Bruce had 36 homers -- tied for 15th in the majors -- and 101 RBI, tied for 18th best. That doesn't suck.


RBIs mean nothing in player evaluation, and the HR are nice but he still made more than average amount of outs to counter that one skill.


RBI reflect that he had a hit -- or at least put the ball in play (or walked with the bases loaded) -- with people on base. Last night we were 0-9 with people in scoring position. I would have liked some RBI.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


the Mets have 5 outfielders and he's the worst one and the most limited, that seems to suck for me, even if it's not Tebow level of sucking.


41Forever wrote:
41Forever wrote:
Last year Bruce had 36 homers -- tied for 15th in the majors -- and 101 RBI, tied for 18th best. That doesn't suck.


RBIs mean nothing in player evaluation, and the HR are nice but he still made more than average amount of outs to counter that one skill.


RBI reflect that he had a hit -- or at least put the ball in play (or walked with the bases loaded) -- with people on base. Last night we were 0-9 with people in scoring position. I would have liked some RBI.


I would've too, and the best way to get one is to get the best hitters on the team up, and that's not Bruce. Bruce having RBI is a direct result of the rest of the team being good in front of him.


Posted


Ceetar wrote:
And there are roughly 100 better ways to pick the player you want to come up in that situation than RBI.

I'll start.

1. Projectable frame.
2. Swagger.
3. The good face.
4. Literacy.
5. Penis size.


Guest 41Forever
Guests
Posted


Bruce having RBI is a direct result of the rest of the team being good in front of him.


I get that he has to have people on base a head of him, which is why leadoff hitters don't get a lot of RBI and that it's not the best measure for people batting in that spot.

But, the RBI are a reflection of him having a productive at-bat while those good players are on base ahead of him. If he's driving in 101 people, he can't be all bad. Factor in that he did a chunk of that playing four months for us last year, without the benefit of him having a lot of good guys on base ahead of him.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


yes, and the reason some of the guys behind him didn't have as high totals is because Bruce made outs at higher than the league average rate, suppressing base-runners.

If you magically gave all of those Bruce AB to Granderson or Conforto or Cespedes or Nimmo, they'd likely have HIGHER totals.


Guest 41Forever
Guests
Posted


Ceetar wrote:
yes, and the reason some of the guys behind him didn't have as high totals is because Bruce made outs at higher than the league average rate, suppressing base-runners.

If you magically gave all of those Bruce AB to Granderson or Conforto or Cespedes or Nimmo, they'd likely have HIGHER totals.



Yeah, but -- Granderson was super streaky, Cespedes was hurt, Nimmo was a rookie and Conforto already was in the lineup. Bruce was the guy we had, and he was effective at bringing to the plate 101 guys who were on base ahead of him. He had 75 when he left the team, and still was the team leader at the end.

I'm not saying he's a league MVP. But I don't understand the dislike. He's a solid player.


Guest 41Forever
Guests
Posted


Bruce seems intent on proving me wrong tonight, both in the field and at the plate....


  • 2 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...