Frayed Knot wrote: Frayed Knot wrote: "But he has to keep the HRs above the errors through out the second half. If he makes it past the ASG it shouldn't be too hard to meet my expectations. I'm not asking too much from the guy." -- Judged by the history of the position, this is virtually the definition of asking too much from him. In the case of Flores I think it's a pretty fair measuring stick. I mean, what he's there for. To hit homers. If he can't do it, and he can't field at least average, he shouldn't be there in the first place. But Sandy made his choice. I'm for giving Flores the time he needs to succeed. And that would be early July. I don't understand a single bit of the logic being used here. Not the initial part behind this arbitrary linkage between HRs & errors; not why you seem to think that it should apply to Flores in particular; not how he, presumably more than others, was brought it "to hit homers"; not why his inevitable replacement, almost certainly to fall short of the same standard, wouldn't be subject to the same rigor. It's all there in my comments, my reasoning. He's got a job to do. In light of what the team says they expect from him, and in turn what I expect from him, he needs to do certain things to be acceptable as a shortstop. Don't look for logic here. This is a fan who thinks logically Flores should not be our shortstop. But the team went that way. I'll support the decision up to a certain point, with my own specifics in mind. Think of it as a "fan thing" if you want. I'm just stating my views. Honestly, following baseball, I do not hold all players to the same standard. It's usually what they are supposed to be doing as opposed to what they are actually doing. Expectations.