SteveJRogers wrote: Makes you wonder why the North East and Ohio teams didn't try to get their domed stadium proposals through. Granted that dome on top of the original design for the project soon to become Citi Field back in the late 1990s was awful, I really wonder why Citi Field lost its dome? Because: 1. Domes are more expensive to build, especially when you're trying to get public financing. 2. Ditto the expense of maintaining a movable roof. 3. Domes are unpopular with fans. 4. Most of the time games can be rescheduled. The odds of a fifth game of the World Series in a torrential downpour are slim enough for most teams that it would be hard to justify the dome on those grounds. 5. As you stated, the Citi Field dome was awful.