LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote: The equation changed drastically with Beltran out and a diminishing number of free agents. Given the cross-the-fingers roster-build O's put together/preserved, if the Mets indeed have 15-20 million dollars that they could spend, then NOT spending an extra 1-5 million dollars to secure the rare commodity-- volatile though it may be-- that is a significant step up from all other available commodity options isn't just silly, it's LUDICROUS. (As far as financial risk, this isn't Castillo's contract... this is a ONE YEAR DEAL. Perform, don't perform, get injured, squirt bleach on reporters... he's gone at year's end.) The Mets have "4 guys." That's about accurate. Three of them are coming off injury, and only one of them-- speaking frankly-- has been an above-average major-league starter (taking into account both performance and durability) over the course of his career. The Mets may have an average/above-average rotation if everything goes right. You don't normally want to plan for an 'if-everything-goes-right' scenario... but, hell, if you do, you want to raise that ceiling as much as possible. ESPECIALLY if you have the competitive advantage of the 2nd-or-3rd fattest wallet in your particular field. maybe some kid stole the wallet at recess..Mets playing the whole off-season cheap