In an interview, Alderson chastised The Athletic for what he felt was an unfair characterization of how the organization handled allegations of wrongdoing. He also felt some stories spotlighted employees who were tasked with gathering information but were not decision-makers. “Let me try to make a point as strongly as I can, OK? Not every instance involving men, women in the workplace is a capital offense, OK? Every time something happens, it doesn't mean somebody has to be fired,” Alderson said. “There are a lot of intermediate steps that can be taken and we've done that in a variety of different cases. And have included capital punishment as a consequence in some cases, but not every case rises to the level of execution. And that's what honestly I think is happening with these articles (in The Athletic). People are getting executed, including women, by the way, for reasons that are unjustifiable.” Absent any other context, and if you squint REALLY hard, you could see that maybe Sandy is doing that thing here where he's passionately protecting the organizaton against outsiders who would harm it, and that maybe he doesn't feel this way. Maybe he's just saying these things, and internally, he's doing the right ones. Maybe. His actions re: hiring/discipline since rejoining the team make it almost impossible to hold that position. "Capital offense." "People getting executed." The more you read, the more it begins to feel like he was a minute/a Scotch away from yelping "facts over feelings" and "CRY MORE" into the phone. Sandy doesn't really seem to get it.