Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Edgy MD

Site Manager
  • Posts

    92,382
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    36

 Content Type 

Profiles

New York Mets News, Rumors & Analysis

New York Mets Videos

2026 New York Mets Top Prospect Rankings

New York Mets Trade & Free Agent Rumors

New York Mets Fan Guides & Resources

2026 New York Mets Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Edgy MD

  1. I don't think we know what anybody is. We recognize trends and patterns and conclude likelihoods from them.
  2. That would be a cool watch to get if you get it for hitting 50 homers.
  3. I think it is more true that (1) he hasn't hit enough to play regularly, and (2) they see him as a superior infielder, and so saw more value in playing him at second and McNeil in center than vice versa. I don't think that is the last word, but it appears to be the authoritative word for now.
  4. Vientos ain't seen a strike.
  5. Chasing is unwise, Alonso. Don't do that, Jeff McNeil.
  6. It feels personal to me. Others have posted similar comments about the Mets being less than good with no response So, there is no distinction to you between "the entire team sucks" and "the Mets being less than good"? You really think I don't disagree with other people enough? Case closed indeed.
  7. Edgy MD wrote: =ashie62 post_id=205743 time=1758934960 user_id=90] Mendoza looks almost frozen in the dugout. I know the pitching has been subpar but the in game management of it has cost games at least to me It is hard to manage when the whole team sucks. Now you're just fucking with me
  8. =ashie62 post_id=205743 time=1758934960 user_id=90] Mendoza looks almost frozen in the dugout. I know the pitching has been subpar but the in game management of it has cost games at least to me
  9. Frayed Knot wrote: The Mets are 4th in the NL in walks. They've got to be working some counts. They literally employ Juan Soto. The claim of not working counts flies about as well as the one that the whole team sucks.
  10. =ashie62 post_id=205730 time=1758934130 user_id=90] In the collective it sucks
  11. Take a pitch, Mets.
  12. Getting out managed, too. Sending your pitching coach out for a mound conference, only to see the Marlins announce a pinch-hitter after the conference is getting caught with your pants down. Beyond that, I think the jury is back with regard to the wisdom of hooking Sproat. But no, the whole team does not suck.
  13. =Gwreck post_id=205723 time=1758933530 user_id=56] I wouldn't pull Sproat here. 61 pitches, 2 outs, 1 run game, runner on first? I let him try to end it here, and maybe another inning.
  14. Giftwrapped fourth run.
  15. The Marlins are peppering Pete Alonso over there.
  16. With a five-pitch fourth, he lowers that average-pitches-per-inning to 11.75. Let him ramble on, Mr. Mendoza.
  17. Sproat averaging 14 pitches per inningmabob.
  18. Didn't get picked. Still watching. Sproat sure did good to lose that mustache.
  19. =ashie62 post_id=205686 time=1758921557 user_id=90]I would ride Tyrone Taylor through the weekend
  20. That flirtation with returning Nimmo to center against righties has come to an end. That hope eternal than Mullins can get it done persists. May it prove worthy
  21. Thank you for confirming what I was too tired to do more than speculate about. The Pads and Brews have a good reason to go pretty hard. Good show.
  22. That popup was a fun play. Swanson is upside down in the crowd, and it looks like he just poops the ball out to Shaw to continue the play.
  23. MARLIN #1: Nice game! We just shut out the Dodgers! MARLIN #2: Meh. It's not like it was the Mets. MARLIN #1: True that! When do we play those shits again? MARLIN #2: Seven weeks. MARLIN #1: How do we even stay engaged until then? MARLIN #2: Here's a picture of Reed Garrett. MARLIN #1: Oh, God. THAT asshole. MARLIN #2: Right?
  24. Oh, you're breaking 100% of my heart.
  25. I probably have this wrong, as it is late and I am tired, but I calculate 64 possible outcomes. Assuming a 50/50 chance of either team winning each game, the [MetsBlue]Mets[/MetsBlue] come out on top in 34 of the scenarios (53.13%), the Reds take the spot in 24 versions (37.50%), and the Diamondbacks triumph in 6 (9.38%). That adds up to 100.01% but rounding does that sort of thing. The Mets would look better if they held any tie-breakers, but, alas, they do not. Of course, it is not a 50/50 chance of either team winning each game. The Reds and Diamondbacks are facing clearly better teams, but as they are also teams safely in the playoffs, they have incentive to give their starters short workdays. On the other hand, the Padres could still climb to a higher seed, and the Brewers could still fall to a lower one, so maybe they play for reals.
×
×
  • Create New...