Of course he does. And the bullpen coach. And various people in the front office. But Otto is indicting Mendoza. That does not make him wrong, of course, but if I am doing the interviewing, my first followup question is going to be about Jeremy Hefner, Desi Druschel, José Rosado, Jack Bredeson, Jono Armold, etc. — to find out where the culture is working and where it is breaking down, so we have a full picture of who we might want to exile and who we might want to bank on. Does he really want to see the whole pitching side of the organization burned or is his beef with Mendoza? If the latter, how much of that beef is about policy and how much about personality? It seems a little of both with Adam. And in a game where both teams want to win, and injuries fall like snow upon the living and the dead, good policies and good intentions can still produce bad outcomes. It is challenging to hear voices in 2025 decry onerous workload burdens, when I cry out that managers are working with neurotic obsession trying to spare pitchers the sort of workloads that could help them win. But as long as games still have nine innings, when you spare one guy, somebody at the other end has to pick up the slack. it all depends on what side of the golden handshake you live on. That said, I fully believe that bullpenning is a less onerous life if guys are called on for longer appearances less frequently. Two to three innings twice a week gets more out of a guy than one inning four times a week, while (to my thinking) taxes him less.