I'd not be surprised if the Wilpon's had given thought to Reyes having a crap season and getting him on the cheap. I think that whole Wilponian rant in 'The New Yorker' was merely him just trying to impress writer Toobin that he wasn't just some doddering owner, but rather an ex-player who knows baseball. 'Look, just because we hire a GM for this kind of evaluation stuff that doesn't mean I'm incapable of reaching such decisions myself, he seems to be saying; 'I know the difference between good players and superstars and also between those who deserve top-shelf contracts and not ... ' In short, I don't think what he said really has any bearing on what eventually happens. The outside stories of why the Mets are going to deal Reyes are mostly based on several assumptions: 1) the team doesn't have the money -- logical, though largely speculative even if it does get passed off as hard fact by those who have no hard facts 2) the Alderson crew are strict 'Moneyball' adherents who are going to look at Reyes's (usually) pedestrian OBA and run for the hills -- stupidly and hopelessly uninformed 3) this team can't and won't be good for at least the next decade so blowing it up is the only choice -- Absurd. "Experts" read teams incorrectly (both ways) all the time even within the season that's currently going on, so this notion that they know what's going to occur even in the relatively short future is simply arrogant.