Edgy DC wrote: (m) none of the above edit: Scratch that. I guess I'd put Miller in. what he said I know Seaver is all for Miller, and Ralph too, but there still is strong resistance to him, from who though? It's not that there's strong resistence, it's that there's been several different inducting bodies and processes, and lack of clarity about the roles of the different committees, so he's not been a priority. He's really in a category of one. It's like, a committee convenes and prepares to compare Richie Allen to Tony Olivo to Dick Williams and is suddenly asked, "Should Ted Giannoulas be inducted?" A rational response is, "I guess so, maybe, but who do you compare him to? Are we supposed to be judges of good mascotting? Does the Hall cover that? Should we be the ones to expand the Hall's mandate? I'm new here. Am I going to do something controversial here without even realizing it? Shouldn't somebody else be calling that shot?" Seaver would do well by not complaining after the fact but lobbying beforehand. That's Tom fucking Seaver you are talking to mate, only the greatest Met EVER , says Mark Hermann at Newsday http://www.newsday.com/sports/baseball/mets/countdown-top-10-mets-of-all-time-1.2438999