From John Delcos of the Journal News in his LoHud Blog: ]The Mets hit the skids after the Subway Series. Roberto Alomar and Mo Vaughn were among their horrible decisions. Tom Glavine, however, was the lead domino. Pedro Martinez came later. But it was the Mets� ability to land tonight�s pitcher � never mind the monetary motives � that signaled the franchise was serious about winning. Glavine left a winning tradition to come to New York, and when a player of his stature makes such a move it told others to consider the Mets. Having Glavine made it easier to later get Martinez, Carlos Beltran and Billy Wagner. Having Glavine has made everything easier. I've never heard of such an interpretation of Glavine's signing and I don't buy it at all. I always took the wooing of Glavine as a misguided impulse on ownership's part, considering where the club was after 2002. Glavine would have been a great pitcher for a team one starter away from a title. The Mets, entering 2003, were not that club. I don't believe his accepting big-time monetary compensation to come here instead of Philadelphia (another nonwinning tradition he would have lowered himself to partake in had the bucks been there) had a thing to do with the later moves under a different regime. Glavine eventually worked out because the team was torn apart and put back together by somebody else in a different era. By then, Tom was a holdover, not the first domino. It's to his credit he persevered and has produced since the second half of 2005, but he was never the harbinger of anything except gettin' paid. Among the beat writers, Delcos seems to understand how to best utilize his blog, but this assertion makes zero sense to me. I also read "Having Glavine has made everything easier" as Delcos prefers talking to him as opposed to other Mets.