John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote: ...the guy has been U-S-E-L-E-S-S since September of 2005. Point that Pedro hasn't been the man of steel since then taken (and assessment of his training methods not necessarily disputed at the moment), but the stated time frame seems a little off, literally speaking. First eleven starts of 2006, when the Mets were building their impenetrable lead: 5-1 2.50 ERA 75.2 IP 44 Hits 17 Walks 88 Strikeouts He had six starts that May that resulted in one loss and five no-decisions: PIT 6 IP, 1 ER, 3 H, 1 BB, 9 K (Wagner BS in 9th) PHI 7 IP, 3 ER, 4 H, 2 BB, 10 K (walkoff loss) MIL 7 IP, 4 ER, 4 H, 2 BB, 10 K (walkoff loss) MFY 7 IP, 0 ER, 4 H, 1 BB, 8 K (Wagner coughs up 9th) FLA 7 IP, 2 ER, 5 H, 0 BB, 10 K ARI 8 IP, 0 ER, 5 H, 0 BB, 8 K (Scoreless duel with Webb) If he comes out of that May 8-1, which seems conservative and reasonable all things considered, I think we remember Pedro 2006 and the whole Pedro tenure a little more kindly. The bullpen did not perform up to early '06 standards in any of those games except the last one. Since then, given his various maladies, I'd add that he's been intermittently very useful, though not as useful as he could be were he healthy. Whether his health has been hindered by how hard he is pushed or pushes himself, I could not say. But I would not say he's been useless since 9/05.