Limbaugh is paid to be virulently opinionated to say nothing of offensive (he's only been bellowing about "feminazis" for 24 years). Imus was paid to be irreverent, albeit with a gloss of down-home intellectual curiosity. Their employers could have given two figs what they said as long as the balance sheet worked in their favor. When "sluts" and "nappy-headed ho's" proved potentially unprofitable, the balance tipped the other way. Those are commercial enterprises, and and their cases, in a way, exemplify the free market. People get up in arms over their "outrageousness," advertisers pull out. Advertisers pull out, all that opinion and irreverence suddenly ain't worth standing behind...even though their employers knew damn well what they had nurtured. Guillen's brand equity is loose cannon. That's what the Marlins hired. They didn't count on him turning around and firing in their own faces is all. Marlins ownership is a worm, but I can't blame them for trying to wriggle off the hook Ozzie (and they, by hiring him) created. If Guillen was speaking from some (bizarre) conviction that Castro was good for Cuba, and stuck to it, I'd sort of respect the taking of a stand. But he was just being wacky because that's what Ozzie Guillen does. Thank goodness MLB condemned him, because they would never associate with something as wretched as an arm of Castro's government, lest they be seen as having legitimized his freedom-squelching regime. No, not them.