Vic Sage wrote: Certainly true, which is why I said he is behind those 4. He is MILES ahead of Rivera, he may have been the "best closer ever" but to me that's like being the "best punter ever", I don't think Rivera is comparable to any hall-worthy starting pitcher. so you would exclude relievers from the HOF on principle? really? Then, presumably, DHs are excluded, too, i guess, right? so you would banish Hoyt Wilhelm, Rollie Fingers, Dennis Eckersley, Bruce Sutter and Goose Gossage, deeming them not worthy of CONSIDERATION? Not to mention E.Mart, Molitor, and the upcoming candidacy of Frank Thomas? I agree that the limited nature of their contribution makes the bar higher for them, but the point is you wouldn't compare Rivera to any other hall-worthy starting pitcher, you'd compare him to the other relievers of his era. It's a job major leaguers perform on a team (more important now than ever). I understand that you would not give relievers the points you'd give guys who pitched at a high level for 200+ IP every year, but i don't think you exclude him from consideration on principle. There are some relatively weak hitting defensive players in the HOF; they are not excluded because they didn't put up HOF worthy stats with their bats, their bats are simply put in context with their glove. By the way, Jan Stenerud is in the football HOF. so they let kickers in, when they're good enough to make an impact with their leg that outweighs their lack of impact the rest of the time. And if ever there was a reliever who meets that standard, it's Mario Rivera, loathe as i am to say so. I dont think a Dh should be disqualified, but i think they should be treated as having negative value on the easiest position on the defensive spectrum. they may also desreve a penalty for the presumed ease of staying healthy and rested there. When i look at a DH i evaluate him as if he were a guy you cringed to watch playing 1B. If Frank Thomas had spent his whole career at DH he'd still be a HOFer based on offense alone (in my opinion), but Edgar? I'm not sure yet. Thats where the 15 years on the ballot can be beneficial in giving time to decide. Its not that I want to to wait on more deserving guys, its just that I havent decided yet. I dont think Rivera is on the level of any of those relievers who are in the hall, they all pitched ALOT more innings than him, and that matters. I think its hard for a modern day reliever, who tops out probably around 1300 innings, to be hall-worthy. edit- i cant get the table to work, but Rivera pitched 200% less innings than Eckersley, and 100% less than Wilhelm, 50% less than Gossage or Fingers. He ptched more than Sutter, who I dont think belongs anywhere near the HOF.