stevejrogers Old-Timey Member Posted September 25, 2016 Posted September 25, 2016 (edited) This weekend officially made sure the Mets remained one of 4 teams with 5 or more divisional titles, but none in back-to-back (and belly-to-belly) fashion.Name the other four and guess how many division titles the franchise has won.OE: Forgot one team does have multiple titles to their credit.OE II: Yeah, Mets are one out of five Need to stop doing something on this scale solely on a smart phone! Edited September 25, 2016 by Guest
Elster88 Old-Timey Member Posted September 25, 2016 Posted September 25, 2016 (edited) SteveJRogers wrote:This weekend officially made sure the Mets remained one of 5 teams with 5 or more divisional titles, but none in back-to-back (and belly-to-belly) fashion.Name the other four, and guess how many division titles the franchise has won.Good trivia question. How about the Rangers?I'm guessing you just copied and pasted this here after posting it on a Yankees forum, and forgot to take the John Sterling reference out. Yuck. Edited September 25, 2016 by Guest
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted September 25, 2016 Posted September 25, 2016 SteveJRogers wrote:This weekend officially made sure the Mets remained one of 5 teams with 5 or more divisional titles, but none in back-to-back (and belly-to-belly) fashion.Name the other four, and guess how many division titles the franchise has won.So this is specifically Division Titles and therefore the answers all have to come from post-1968 seasons?
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted September 25, 2016 Posted September 25, 2016 Frayed Knot wrote:SteveJRogers wrote:This weekend officially made sure the Mets remained one of 5 teams with 5 or more divisional titles, but none in back-to-back (and belly-to-belly) fashion.Name the other four, and guess how many division titles the franchise has won.So this is specifically Division Titles and therefore the answers all have to come from post-1968 seasons?Assuming those are the goalposts under which we're operating here (SJR appears to be off-line right now) my first though was the BoSox who, for all their success recently, they never seem to put two together in consecutive years. As for the specific number of AL East titles for the BoSox ... I'll take a shot at 7
stevejrogers Old-Timey Member Posted September 25, 2016 Author Posted September 25, 2016 Frayed Knot wrote:SteveJRogers wrote:This weekend officially made sure the Mets remained one of 5 teams with 5 or more divisional titles, but none in back-to-back (and belly-to-belly) fashion.Name the other four, and guess how many division titles the franchise has won.So this is specifically Division Titles and therefore the answers all have to come from post-1968 seasons?Yup
stevejrogers Old-Timey Member Posted September 25, 2016 Author Posted September 25, 2016 Elster88 wrote:SteveJRogers wrote:This weekend officially made sure the Mets remained one of 5 teams with 5 or more divisional titles, but none in back-to-back (and belly-to-belly) fashion.Name the other four, and guess how many division titles the franchise has won.Good trivia question. How about the Rangers?I'm guessing you just copied and pasted this here after posting it on a Yankees forum, and forgot to take the John Sterling reference out. Yuck.Rangers won the AL West twice in a pair of consecutive seasons; 1998-1999 and 2010-2011And the line is a reference to this
stevejrogers Old-Timey Member Posted September 25, 2016 Author Posted September 25, 2016 Frayed Knot wrote:Frayed Knot wrote:SteveJRogers wrote:This weekend officially made sure the Mets remained one of 5 teams with 5 or more divisional titles, but none in back-to-back (and belly-to-belly) fashion.Name the other four, and guess how many division titles the franchise has won.So this is specifically Division Titles and therefore the answers all have to come from post-1968 seasons?Assuming those are the goalposts under which we're operating here (SJR appears to be off-line right now) my first though was the BoSox who, for all their success recently, they never seem to put two together in consecutive years. As for the specific number of AL East titles for the BoSox ... I'll take a shot at 7Red Sox are indeed one of the four, and they are on the verge of making it 8 AL East titles, but none in consecutive fashion.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted September 25, 2016 Posted September 25, 2016 Next guess = SFGI know they won once in the early '70s, then at least one during Will the Thrill's heyday, and then their current three hop-scotching titles.I may be missing a couple somewhere, but I'll say the Giants and exactly five.
stevejrogers Old-Timey Member Posted September 25, 2016 Author Posted September 25, 2016 Frayed Knot wrote:Next guess = SFGI know they won once in the early '70s, then at least one during Will the Thrill's heyday, and then their current three hop-scotching titles.I may be missing a couple somewhere, but I'll say the Giants and exactly five.Right franchise, wrong number. The BoSox are on the verge of tying them with 8 divisional titles.Giants 8 (FK) 1971 1987 1989 1997 2000 2003 2010 2012Red Sox 7 (FK) 1975 1986 1988 1990 1995 2007 2013-Mets 6 1969 1973 1986 1988 2006 2016-Wrong answersRangers
HahnSolo Old-Timey Member Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 Stumped. Are you counting the Expos and Nationals as one franchise? I'll guess the Expos/Nats, with five.
stevejrogers Old-Timey Member Posted September 26, 2016 Author Posted September 26, 2016 HahnSolo wrote:Stumped. Are you counting the Expos and Nationals as one franchise? I'll guess the Expos/Nats, with five.They consider themselves the same franchise, so yes.
stevejrogers Old-Timey Member Posted September 26, 2016 Author Posted September 26, 2016 John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:White SoxDing Ding
stevejrogers Old-Timey Member Posted September 26, 2016 Author Posted September 26, 2016 Ah hell, kind of messed up a bit, through the XPoNats out with only 4 (1 Montreal in 1981, 3 Washington 2012, 2014 and now 2016)Just realized since despite being considered the NL "Champions" for 1994 for what I'd hope are reasons beyond Felipe Alou managing the 1995 All-Star Game, I'm not sure if the teams that finished in the division and wild card slots at the time of the strike are officially recognized as such (i.e. the Braves don't acknowledge that they were in the lead of the NL Wild Card as part of their 1992-2005 epic run).So that being said, that's why the White Sox are allowed to be an answer with 1983, 1993, 2000, 2005 and 2008, though they were leading the AL Central at the time of the 1994 strike.
Zach Thornton Syracuse Mets - AAA LHP On Sunday, the southpaw tossed five shutout innings as the bulk pitcher. He gave up 2 hits, walked 2 and had 5 strikeouts. Explore Zach Thornton News >
Recommended Posts