Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Bunting: That Thing That Losers Do


Guest Edgy DC

Recommended Posts

Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


You've probably not thought about it, but perhaps have felt it, but it's been 49 2/3 innings since the Mets last sacrifice bunt --- at least their last successful one. It was a fifth-inning jobbie by Turner in a 4-1 victory over Oakland actually led to a score. That's what big gaps and AL rules will get you.

The Mets have had only five sacrifice hits in June, compared to 11 in May and 14 in April. Trending positive, there.

They are now 13th of 16 NL teams in sacrifice hits.

They're suddenly bleeding third in OPS! Tied for second, really!


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Lead the world in walks drawn.


Posted


Edgy DC wrote:
You've probably not thought about it, but perhaps have felt it, but it's been 49 2/3 innings since the Mets last sacrifice bunt --- at least their last successful one. It was a fifth-inning jobbie by Turner in a 4-1 victory over Oakland actually led to a score. That's what big gaps and AL rules will get you.

The Mets have had only five sacrifice hits in June, compared to 11 in May and 14 in April. Trending positive, there.

They are now 13th of 16 NL teams in sacrifice hits.

They're suddenly bleeding third in OPS! Tied for second, really!



wow...good times


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Well, if the aim's to get a guy to second, a walk works just as well.

Capuano got one down last night, BTW.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
Well, if the aim's to get a guy to second, a walk works just as well.

Capuano got one down last night, BTW.


wish Gee had bunted on Saturday. SqueEEEEZeee


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Squeegies turn into doubleplays often enough also.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


Edgy DC wrote:
Squeegies turn into doubleplays often enough also.


Yeah yeah..i guess Texiera's a good fielder, but Colon and A-Rod not so much. What's the philosophy on a squeeze, where are you supposed to bunt it? towards first? Probably makes sense if the first baseman is left-handed because he'd have to pivot to throw home, and vacates first making it harder to turn 2?


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


I'd think third-base line. You have the screen of the runner coming home-- any play at the plate will have to go through/around the runner himself-- and if they get him, the catcher has to turn, then throw against the direction of the turn.

I would have tried a squeeze with Gee, too.


Posted


LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
I'd think third-base line. You have the screen of the runner coming home-- any play at the plate will have to go through/around the runner himself-- and if they get him, the catcher has to turn, then throw against the direction of the turn.

I would have tried a squeeze with Gee, too.




Just to hear Sterling say SqueeGee would have been worth it.


Posted


A good squeeze play is more about THAT you bunt it than WHERE.
The problem with the squeeze with the bags loaded is that it makes a force-out or even DP easier (particularly if not disguised well) - or if it's the suicide variety then a missed bunt fucks the inning just the way the GiDP did.



The string of few Sac Bunts by the Mets is not all good news as much of that is/was due to the pitchers failing horribly when called upon.
The better news is that [u:1ik5sfpy]NYM position players[/u:1ik5sfpy] have only SB'd like 8 times this year. Under previous skippers 8 SBs was more like a series' worth.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...