soupcan Old-Timey Member Posted April 15, 2011 Posted April 15, 2011 (edited) The answer is no.That cash infusion is to help them cover operating expenses and pay back loans.My hope is that whoever the minority investor is, he is savvy enough to put a clause in whatever agreement he signs with the Wilpons/Katzes that is similar to the clause in the agreement that Fred had with Doubleday allowing him to buy out his former partner when Nelson didn't really want to sell.OE: Sorry that didn't read how I meant it. Doubleday felt forced to take less than what he thought was fair value for his half. Edited April 15, 2011 by Guest
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted April 15, 2011 Posted April 15, 2011 I don't pretend that I can see the future but I don't ignore obvious signs either.Am I ignoring something?
soupcan Old-Timey Member Posted April 15, 2011 Posted April 15, 2011 I don't know, are you?As I said, I've read a lot of stuff which leads me to believe that no matter how the Wilpons/Katzes come out of this, the way they ran the finances through, in and aroiund Madoff was done in such a way that even the most experienced forensic accountants have been scratching their heads trying to unravel it all.They do not have the financial wherewithall that they once had (by a significant margin) and will not be able to support the running of the team in a similar fashion to how they had.They would borrow from banks and then hand the money over to Madoff to invest, thinking that the returns they got back from Bernie would cover the interest/principal on those loans and then both finance team operations and reinvest with Madoff(!) the rest.Monies for deferred salaries were all with Madoff as well as 401(k)s and Lord knows what else.
Zach Thornton Syracuse Mets - AAA LHP On Sunday, the southpaw tossed five shutout innings as the bulk pitcher. He gave up 2 hits, walked 2 and had 5 strikeouts. Explore Zach Thornton News >
Recommended Posts