Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Endy Derby?


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr

Recommended Posts

Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Begins in two months, as he may be willing to sign a minor-league deal. At these prices, who can say no? (And what's a couple of knee ligaments between friends?)


Posted


if he really is willing to take a minor league deal just give it to him, at the very least he can make the pitchers in Buffalo look better with his glove.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Um... a reminder: he's more than "The Catch." Provided the knee's decent, Endy's so good with the glove that he provides more defensive value in half a season than an average CF does in a whole year. He's so good that even if he's terrible offensively, he's a 2.0 WAR player (what we'll hope Francoeur is worth in a year of starting, with bat and glove).

If he's at all healthy-- and yes, a lot will depend on the workout-- I'd give him a guaranteed 700K at least, MAJOR league.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Exceeding expectations from the moment you put on a Mets uniform and involvement in one of the most amazing plays any of us has ever/will ever see go a pretty long way toward bumping up one's popularity.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


So the cynic might ask why bring him back and spoil that.

If Timo disappeared after the NLCS, he'd never again have to pay for a meal or a drink in New York.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


It wouldn't be for a farewell tour. Even if he's 80-90 percent of what he was, he's great bench value, and the sort of player that championship teams have at 4th-5th OF.


Posted


Not out of the question, but if Pagan were going to be my 4th then I'd prefer someone a bit more dissimilar to be my 5th - rather than just someone who's a kind of Angel-lite.
Endy brings a better glove (although Angel is hardly inept) and makes fewer brain-farts on the bases but otherwise has similar skills only not as good and minus the switch-hitting and any semblance of power. You don't want an entire bench of speedy/slappy guys.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


I would take an entire team of speedy/slappy guys if they were superlatively good at making and/or preventing runs.

Angel's pretty decent defensively. Saying that a healthy Endy and Angel are in the same ballpark defensively is a MASSIVE insult to Endy. It's a Bay-versus-Pujols type difference.


Guest metsguyinmichigan
Guests
Posted


Sigh. We'll never have anything like an Endy catch at Citi Field unless the outfielders are allowed to bring a step ladder out there with them.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


I never said Endy was an offensive plus... or even offensively average. But the upgrade from Pagan to Chavez is from "pretty good" to "OMG AMAZING."

I'm in favor of signing him-- health pending-- not because of warm and fuzzies. I'm in favor of signing him because he's a defensive weapon-- as confirmed by DEWAN (over the last five years, +20-30 plays yearly between LF, RF and CF... in a thin slice of playing time), Fangraphs (+10 runs saved over the average CF playing a full season... IN A PART-TIME ROLE; even more valuable in the corners), and most people's freaking eyes. I'm in favor of signing him because he's a 3-4 WAR-with-the-glove guy (say, 2 WAR factoring in his offensive deficit), and he's cheap improvement (by comparison, the team is paying Francoeur about 4 times more for a lot less projected on-field value, and paying Jason Bay $16M this year for about 1 WAR more).

That there are others around who just plain like Endy is great. I like Endy for what he may be able to do, not for pleasant memories. If he's offering himself for anything below a million, he's likely to be a HUGE bargain.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Are you really so confident in the meaning behind those defensive numbers?


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


If you're asking whether I'm familiar with the methodology used to compile each stat, and the general meaning of the numbers? Yes. (I'm also largely familiar with the limitations of each-- the large swings in UZR/150 for some players, e.g.-- which, btw, are mostly minimized when you look at 3-5 year samples.)

If you're asking whether my confidence in those numbers is enough to recommend signing him to a bench OF role for something between a minor-league deal and $1M... yes. The numbers, the GM opinions, our frigging eyes (and I'm talking perceptions of Endy's range and fielding ability, not "that one play I saw"). Do any of them contradict each other?

If he hits, he's an ABSURD value... if he hits, which is highly unlikely (although it happened once on our watch, and Endy put up a 2.5 WAR in a part-time role then). I'm probably exaggerating a bit when I say he's a 2-WAR guy in a part-time role... it's closer to 1-1.5 if he plays something like 500-600 innings/200-300 PAs. But that's 1-1.5 marginal wins for less than a million-- a big discount over the going open-market rate.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Well, I'm asking the latter. Are you confident enough to believe (1) that's a meaningful representation of his value to a team, and (2) that it's repeatable.

I'm torn between two thoughts (1) defense wanes as you get older --- your legs being the first to go, so they say, and (2) follow the fella that follows the dream. You've got a thought in your head you believe in, it's a different thought from what other guys may be working with, so sure, I give you permission to go ahead with a low-budget signing. The fifth outfield slot isn't so locked in. We lose a decent pinch hitter, maybe in Martinez or Carter, but Pagan becomes more burnable as a pinch-hitter while we have Endy to play defense.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


I'd say that:

1) Yes.
2) Dunno. The knee injury, in my mind, is the biggest variable. Knee ligaments generally are more of a limit on quick-cut lateral action (as with running backs, say, or basketball players), so he should probably be okay. But, yeah, all my assertin'-- and I'll be honest, there's a tiny soupcon of devil's advocacy in there-- is predicated on his being 85-90 percent of what he was. I'd jump on a minor-league contract in a heartbeat... but I think a lot of clubs will be in on that (including Seattle).

I think part of my wanting him on the bench stems from the fact that I think of Pagan and Francoeur as I want them to be-- a fungible platoony pair for RF-- than as they likely are (Frenchy with backup/sidekick Pagan).


Guest Rockin' Doc
Guests
Posted


Endy was far better than expected during his time with the Mets. He was a defensive standout that provided adequate offense in a back up role. I definitely think it's worth taking a flyer on him for a minor league deal. He would provide depth in the event of injury and he would make a great late inning defensive replacement for Francoeur or Bay. If his knee ultimately prevents him from filling the role envisioned above, then the Mets aren't out much financially and he can mentor Fernando Martinez on defense in Buffalo while the Bison fans get to see a fan favorite.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Not out of the question, but if Pagan were going to be my 4th then I'd prefer someone a bit more dissimilar to be my 5th - rather than just someone who's a kind of Angel-lite.
Endy brings a better glove (although Angel is hardly inept) and makes fewer brain-farts on the bases but otherwise has similar skills only not as good and minus the switch-hitting and any semblance of power. You don't want an entire bench of speedy/slappy guys.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...