Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted November 17, 2008 Posted November 17, 2008 Crazy Met fan body ink:http://www.checkoutmyink.com/tattoos/cisco723/mets-tribal
Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket Guests Posted November 17, 2008 Posted November 17, 2008 Yeah I don't get it.
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted November 17, 2008 Posted November 17, 2008 It's an interesting look. If the Mets offered t-shirts with that logo, I think it would sell fairly well.
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted November 17, 2008 Posted November 17, 2008 Nick Maggio likes his logo with the classick blue skyline over the black.Scott Breslove from Belleville like baserunning Mister over the batting or pitching version. Gotta agree with both, at least to the point where they strap me in the chair.Josh Steinberg, out on the town before his tatt has healed, goes for the outlined blue insignia. Ugh.Steve from Newburgh goes for orange with a slight blue border to contain it, somehow bursting through a crack. An American crack.Jim C from Bay Ridge doesn't color in his Mister.Jim C. also annoys Vic Sage by loving the '55 Dodgers on his other arm.Deltoid or butt cheek?Freak sleeve:All this and more from Brooklyn Met fan.
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted November 17, 2008 Posted November 17, 2008 Was that taken in the mirror? Or was the tattooist the same guy who was the fictional Obama supporter who attacked the girl with the McCain bumper sticker?
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted November 17, 2008 Posted November 17, 2008 I would never get a tattoo, but if I were to get a Mets related tattoo, I like this one the best. (I'd make it smaller, though.) Understated is better.This one is too over the top:And this one is a little too precious:Hopefully that's on a female fan.
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted November 17, 2008 Posted November 17, 2008 I hate when they attack girls with bumper stickers.The light in the photo tells me a mirror was used.
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted November 17, 2008 Posted November 17, 2008 If I wanted to take a photo of the back of my shoulder, I'd hold the camera behind me and click. I wouldn't stand with my back to a mirror and then take a picture, over my shoulder, of the mirror.But diff'rent strokes for diff'rent folks, I guess.
metirish Old-Timey Member Posted November 17, 2008 Posted November 17, 2008 There was a time in my twenties that I wanted to get a tattoo , never did and am sure glad I didn't.
Guest themetfairy Guests Posted November 17, 2008 Posted November 17, 2008 ="Benjamin Grimm":3qvmmtsn]If I wanted to take a photo of the back of my shoulder, I'd hold the camera behind me and click. I wouldn't stand with my back to a mirror and then take a picture, over my shoulder, of the mirror.But diff'rent strokes for diff'rent folks, I guess.[/quote:3qvmmtsn]The other option is to take the picture in the mirror but reverse the image using something like Photoshop (I know that it can be done in Fireworks, so I assume the other high power photo editing tools also do this).Vic Sage Nov 17 2008 09:42 AM]Jim C. also annoys Vic Sage by loving the '55 Dodgers on his other arm. ritual scarring annoys me on principle, but why do you think this would annoy me in particular?Edgy DC Nov 17 2008 09:49 AMBecause you advocated in another thread treating the Dodgers not as Met forebears but as Met enemies. Didn't you?John Cougar Lunchbucket Nov 17 2008 09:55 AMThis is like, why we deserve a punishing recession.Vic Sage Nov 17 2008 10:02 AM]Because you advocated in another thread treating the Dodgers not as Met forebears but as Met enemies. Didn't you?No, i rejected your assertion that anyone offended by the Jackie Robinson Rotunda, with its "42" tribute, was making a real "logical stretch". While i have no feelings about it one way or the other, I offered as an example, not myself but my parents and other Mets fans of their generation who were abandoned by the Dodgers and would, therefore, not necessarily enjoy having their new stadium built as a tribute to their long-hated Dodgers , and that these feelings were not at all illogical.At which point you accused my of arguing for sport, so i stopped participating in that thread.There is no doubt as to the role of the Dodgers as progenitors of the Mets. Anyone who wants to use their body as a billboard for such an assertion runs no risk of rebuke from me... at least not on those grounds.Edgy DC Nov 17 2008 10:24 AMYou think the above is a valid argument, though not yours. Got it.But what I called illogical wasn't so broad, but rather "to link Robinson's legacy an adversarial relationship to the Mets."Edgy DC May 20 2009 12:07 PMSome days, da Mets are destined for da feet:Some days, the Mets play like Pooh:Tattoo ideal girl on body, get ideal girl. A formula for success?Unmanliest tattoo ever seen at Shea:Speaking of dolphins, homeboy seems to have inked his Mets shinguard in Dolphin colors:
Vic Sage Old-Timey Member Posted November 17, 2008 Posted November 17, 2008 ]Jim C. also annoys Vic Sage by loving the '55 Dodgers on his other arm. ritual scarring annoys me on principle, but why do you think this would annoy me in particular?
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted November 17, 2008 Posted November 17, 2008 Because you advocated in another thread treating the Dodgers not as Met forebears but as Met enemies. Didn't you?
Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket Guests Posted November 17, 2008 Posted November 17, 2008 This is like, why we deserve a punishing recession.
Vic Sage Old-Timey Member Posted November 17, 2008 Posted November 17, 2008 ]Because you advocated in another thread treating the Dodgers not as Met forebears but as Met enemies. Didn't you?No, i rejected your assertion that anyone offended by the Jackie Robinson Rotunda, with its "42" tribute, was making a real "logical stretch". While i have no feelings about it one way or the other, I offered as an example, not myself but my parents and other Mets fans of their generation who were abandoned by the Dodgers and would, therefore, not necessarily enjoy having their new stadium built as a tribute to their long-hated Dodgers , and that these feelings were not at all illogical.At which point you accused my of arguing for sport, so i stopped participating in that thread.There is no doubt as to the role of the Dodgers as progenitors of the Mets. Anyone who wants to use their body as a billboard for such an assertion runs no risk of rebuke from me... at least not on those grounds.
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted November 17, 2008 Posted November 17, 2008 You think the above is a valid argument, though not yours. Got it.But what I called illogical wasn't so broad, but rather "to link Robinson's legacy an adversarial relationship to the Mets."
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted May 20, 2009 Posted May 20, 2009 Some days, da Mets are destined for da feet:Some days, the Mets play like Pooh:Tattoo ideal girl on body, get ideal girl. A formula for success?Unmanliest tattoo ever seen at Shea:Speaking of dolphins, homeboy seems to have inked his Mets shinguard in Dolphin colors:
Zach Thornton Syracuse Mets - AAA LHP On Sunday, the southpaw tossed five shutout innings as the bulk pitcher. He gave up 2 hits, walked 2 and had 5 strikeouts. Explore Zach Thornton News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.