Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted


Garrett it is!!
Not just a less-than obvious name but also it was the size of the margin that struck me as I was looking at this stuff!!

All of which leads to the thought - spoke here at least once by one of ira's past identities (which is why I thought he'd be the one to guess it) - that in a more Sabermetric age Garrett would have been a more appreciated player. Plus, if you were to stick 'Red' into not only a more Sabermetric age but also a more weight-lifting and "nutrition" aware age he could have been a real monster since his main drawback was that he finishes 21st out of that group of 30 in "Isolated Slugging" avg (diff between BA & Slg).

Ahh, what could have been!




1WAYNE GARRETT.111
2Magadan.099
3Strawberry.096
4Milner.094
5Mazzilli.093
6THernandez.090
6THarrelson.090
6THoJo.090
9Hundley.083
10TStaub.082
10TStearns.082
12TPiazza.077
12TSwoboda.077
14Alfonzo.075
15TBackman.070
15TCarter.070
17Kingman.068
18Agee.067
19Grote.065
20Boswell.062
21TMcReynolds.059
21TC. Jones.059
23TKranepool.055
23TFoster.055
25Brooks.051
26Millan.048
27Ordonez.045
28Mookie.042
29Reyes.040
30Flynn.030


Posted


By the way, here's the same cast of characters sorted by their Isolated Power numbers (the gap between Slg Avg and BA)
Garrett is down there with Mags & Hubie slumming near the catchers and middle infielders

1Strawberry.257
2Piazza.246
3Kingman.234
4Ho Jo.208
5Hundley.198
6Hernandez.192
7McReynolds.188
8Foster.170
9Milner.170
10Carter.163
11Agee.157
12Alfonzo.153
13TSwoboda.145
13TReyes.145
15Staub.143
16Mazzilli.132
17C. Jones.125
18Mookie.118
19Stearns.116
20Kranepool.116
21Garrett.106
22Brooks.105
23Magadan.094
24Boswell.093
25Grote.073
26Backman.061
27TMillan.059
27TOrdonez.059
29Flynn.058
30Harrelson.053


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted (edited)


I'm surprised Mookie and HoJo have foresworn their last names.


Edited by Guest
Guest Johnny Dickshot
Guests
Posted


]Plus, if you were to stick 'Red' into not only a more Sabermetric age but also a more weight-lifting and "nutrition" aware age he could have been a real monster since his main drawback was that he finishes 21st out of that group of 30 in "Isolated Slugging" avg (diff between BA & Slg).


FWIW, one memorist at UMDB suggests that lifting weights might have been an issue with garrett even back in his playing days. That is, Seaver wasn't fond of Garrett because Garrett was a warning track guy who wasn;t interested in becoming more than that.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...