MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted September 8, 2005 Posted September 8, 2005 FK, Jon Matlack was 125-126 for his career, 82-81 for the MetsSteve Traschel was (prior to this year) 118-131 for his career, 50-47 for the Mets.Why do you think Jon was definitely that much better as a Met?Later
Elster88 Old-Timey Member Posted September 8, 2005 Posted September 8, 2005 62, I think LFK's his point was that Trachsel legitimately is one of the top 14. Your point strengthens his._____________________________This post had the designation 160) Kaz Matsui
MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted September 8, 2005 Posted September 8, 2005 He said "better than". But he also painfully demonstrated that the list sure falls off quickly after that. Later
Recommended Posts