="Edgy DC"]="Zvon"] Not pointing fingers, but I'm sre that image has a record of like 2-51. lol. ="Frayed Knot"] Y'know, it's easy to say that the sac bunts "worked" in the early innings as they led directly to runs. But that's at least partially a false argument. Those runs either would have, or at least could have scored anyway, and what the sac bunts do in the long run is to make it more likely that those innings - some of which were started with leadoff doubles fer crissakes - would top out as single-run innings. Once you give up the out to move the runner over and another to get the run in it's 2-out w/none-on and very little chance of a crooked number going up on the board. I'm really getting sick of this fascination with the sac bunt and those potential runs we're giving up early are coming back to bite us later on as we work with no margin for error. I'm okay with the first inning bunt. Scoring first is something that I think is important. But you have a good point . I wasn't too thrilled at all with the second Cora bunt. We had one out there already and behind Cora : Beltran, Sheff and Wright seeing Moyer for the second time tonight.