Frayed Knot wrote: It was never a secret that ownership didn't really want the ASG. The benefit to the home team is more image than financial and during the later 80s they simply didn't think they needed the boost. By the 90s, not coincidentally as the Wilpons gained full control and as the new wave of stadium building boomed, MLB was increasingly interested in showing off the newer parks and the 'Pons were increasingly embarrassed by the age/condition of Shea. I'll concede that Shea was one big bowel from the mid 90s on. Personally I didn't think it was ever as bad as some said it was-but in comparison to the new parks popping up? Shea was old style. Not old enough to be appreciated though. In the late 80s they should have went for it as a reward to their actual and existing fans, not to get any more fans (of course I understand their selfish logic though). I certainly would have found a way to go. I had to wait until the Phils had the ASG in '96 to go to one. I skipped the one in '76 cause I wanted my ASG experience to be in the Mets ballpark and I figured some year they would have to get it, if even by default. I was always under the impression that MLB approached a team and asked if they wanted to host. Don't mind me, I'm just blowing off steam. So now the Mets will have the ASG at Citi not to repay their fans, but to seek new ones. Suck mah balls Wilpon.