Yea, Bench photo is reversed. Thats a great shot too. No idea if they will correct it (don't even know if Topps is aware of it-Id figure someone told 'em). These days, odds are good that they did it on purpose. I have a bone to pick with Topps. I'm looking into the details of the Archives set (looking at the checklists)and even though I'm only going for the base set, I will vent about what's being done to what used to be the fun hobby of card collecting. For instance- the Archive set is actually 330 cards. They intentionally make the last 30 cards in the set "short print" and very difficult to get. And they say, meh, it's part of the set and, meh, it's not really part of the set, and bullshit like this. Topps, suck mah balls, I'm gonna decide what I'll collect and the 300 card "base" set, that is not the entire set due to your shifty practices, is good enough for me. More on that later cause they have all kinds of side dishes that go with this set. After this set is completed I'm going back to getting only Mets as a protest of what has become of this hobby (I did that back in 1994 too, lol. And now it's ten times worse). If I had the license $$ I would market a set, and it would be a nice simple baseball card set. Overall I have few complaints about 2015 Archives. Here's one. Take a look at this card, a Bill Mazeroski from the archive set: [fimg=300:1gbq29ct]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-NR9A1y0zfe0/VabwB-bypLI/AAAAAAAAcOE/kqlx3C9DHqM/s555-Ic42/83BillMaz.png[/fimg:1gbq29ct] Now there's no way that's Maz from his playing days. It's gotta be an old timers game or something, right? And that yellow. Why would you use that yellow?. There was a reason you didn't use that yellow back in 1983, you numbskulls. [fimg=200:1gbq29ct]https://bapple2286.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/dave-parker-g.jpg[/fimg:1gbq29ct]