Edgy MD wrote: I disagree that signing players to expensive longterm deals has no chance of working out, or practically none. Well, all I need do to show you my point is to exaggerate the length of a long-term contract. Well all I need to do to show you my point is to exaggerate the number of homers he'll hit, championships he will be the difference in, and dollars he'll earn for his employers, but then we're not talking about facts any more. If I sign 24 year old Juan Soto to a top-dollar deal through age 40, that makes sense to you. I didn't write that. I thought we were discussing long-term deals in general. You can make up this random not-yet-existent future and define all the outcomes that haven't happened yet that you want, but please let me represent my own positions. Edgy MD wrote: I disagree that signing players to expensive longterm deals has no chance of working out, or practically none. “Working out” is doing a lot of work in that argument though. What is does it mean to “work out?” Mr. roger_that made the "working out" argument. If he's willing, he can clarify his meaning. I know what the term means to me, but you are also welcome to define terms and see if others will bite.