A real enemy here is that the the Hall does a lot more pruning on the ballot than they used to, before it even gets to the BBWAA. It used to be that almost anybody who got their minimum years in made it onto the ballot. They'd trim a few guys who were backup catchers or mopup relievers their whole careers, but a whole bunch of Matlacks and DeShaieses and Garners who had no chance were still put on the ballot and got their balloons for participating. Now, there's virtually no name on the ballot without a conceivable real argument for inclusion. No names appear that would actually create a broad controversy if they actually got in. (Ok, Brandon Phillips might, but Victor Martinez was better than you might think!) A voter who endeavors to be selective and particular, confronted with a ballot of 50 names, and given a maximum of 10 votes, might check six or seven names, maybe 8 in a good year. But the same voter, confronted with a ballot of thirty names, is more likely to check four boxes, to satisfy his or her sense of high standards, without giving a good thought to the idea that those high standards have already been met with a much more selective ballot. If you want more guys getting past their first pass at the ballot (and by the mighty name of Lou Whitaker, I do), let more guys get on the ballot. Be a big-ballot person.