I was just sorting the Team RISP for a minute, I know that can be scary, and the Mets have the 7th worst OPS in the NL. The Dodgers are best and their OPS is a whopping .272 points higher. Can one say that considering the two teams have the 'same' record that the Mets are pretty damn lucky so far? I gave Pythagoras a call, and he says that the 30–20 (.600) Mets' expected win percentage, based on runs scored and runs against, should be .644. The 31–19 (.620) Dodgers have an expected win percentage of .621. Put another way, he says that the Mets have been unlucky, winning about 2.21 fewer games than they should have (or two games if you are not into hundredths of wins). The Dodgers have broken almost exactly even, luckwise, winning about 0.04 fewer games than their runs ratio would suggest, which rounds, of course, to zero. There are, of course, different ways to frame the question of luck — both the Dodgers and Mets have been hit hard by the injury bug in the starting pitching category — but Pythagoras is a smart guy. He asked if Norrin Raad was the one asking. He likes to call him "No-Win Raad," which is odd when you think that the pun shouldn't work once you translate to ancient Greek, but I said, no, it was you, and that Norrin hasn't posted in quite a while, and went by "Vic Sage" most recently. He said that time flies and to tell you he said hello.