We're going in circles here here. As you point out, Mazzilli's ranking of 30 would not have happened had he had he been on the 1985 team. Better teammmates typically generate more wins, but lower rankings. So Gooden's better score is not the product of better teammates, but better Gooden, standing out in a better field, and getting more points for it. Gooden scores higher, not because he had better teammates, but because he towered above better teammates. Gooden received 8,820 points. Mazzilli received 6,030. That's not a particularly accurate representation of their relative worth (Gooden is probably worth at least two Mazzes, not 1.46), but it's not that innacurate either, and we're talking about an extreme case.