Well, for someone who is joking, you take defending your position dead seriously. "Boobird" = not a particularly serious appellation itself. But whether you are booing a guy directly or ripping him online, the logic is the same. You cannot be proven wrong no matter how the evidence breaks. That sort of logic doesn't sit well with me, and I try and respond to it when it is presented, and respond in the same vein: lightly if it's delivered lightly, seriously if it's delivered seriously. But as you go from joking to serious, depending on how vulnerable your arguments are, it's hard to gauge. Here you are defending your position point-by-intricate point but then saying it's not serious. I'm not sure then how to respond at all. I'll just say I disagree.