To me, the real mindblower is that Conforto's hard grounder to first didn't turn into a game-ending double play. It would have been a tough turn, but in a situation where a double wins it, a single ties it and puts the team in a great position to secure the win, and even a productive out scores the tying run, and even a strikeout leaves them with one more chance — heck, a bouncing curveball could tie it — against a questionable defense, Conforto did the one thing that could cut the Mets legs out from under them: a hard grounder right to an infielder. And again, nothing was automatic there, but that the Mets screwed it up but survived (and prospered!) because the Indians screwed it up worse suggests that ours is not the team playing their heels here. And that's never not a cool feeling.