Frayed Knot wrote: Problem is that HF advantage matters little in baseball and the whole 'rested pitching staff' edge isn't exactly working out as planned. If you're right--and I don't believe you are--then we must question some longstanding principles of baseball ... Or you could accept the much more likely possibility that THIS YEAR, in a small sample size, HF field advantage isn't yielding its usual result so far. Well, HF advantage in baseball IS measurably smaller than in any of the other sports we typically consume typically hovering around 53-54%, roughly the equivalent of home teams going 8-7 over a 15-game span vs 7-8 for the roadies. Not a non-existent edge, but not a big one either. And the extended rest thing (5 games pretty much qualifies as extended in baseball) is new for this season so, yes, it is so far an ongoing sample size of one. As I type, home teams are 10-9 this post-season and the rested vs non-rested teams are deadlocked at 5-5 Also, do keep in mind that the rested teams and the ones with the majority of the home games are, by definition over a six month span, the better team, sometimes by more than 20 games in the standings, and are still basically breaking even. And, again, my point is that if leagues and fans are going to stick with the 'more is better' theory of post-season tourneys then they also need to accept that the marquee events -- the LCSx2 and the WS -- stand a decent chance of not having some or even all of the top teams involved. Some, I'm sure, are going to be OK with that, others I don't believe think it through. I think I can already hear a network executive saying; 'Whattaya mean we're not getting a Dodgers/Yankees matchup'!!