Your opinion, please. These are the last three paragraphs of Martino's game story in today's Daily News: They also clinched a series win and, at 41-39, rose to two games above .500 for the first time since April 5. This is a team that was not expected to contend, and is still not contending - but it is playing respectably, and enjoying the moment. What does this modest success mean, and how far will it take this team? It is useful to remember that, exactly one year before Wednesday night's game, the Jerry Manuel Mets were 43-34, and that record did not even represent their peak. They finished the year 79-83, lousy enough to cost the manager and general manager their jobs. Our point? These Mets have not proven anything yet. Is a game story supposed to have a "point"? It's not a column. He can have a theme or a thread but I don't care what he thinks is "useful" or what his opinion is as part of a game story. In my Happiest Recap research, I'm surprised at how often through fifty years of Mets history game stories (and columns) are peppered with sentiments like this. It's as if "dismal until proven able" is embedded into the DNA of Mets beat writers. It's even more acute today in that there is increased impatience to figure out the endgame of any given moment. It's not enough to say "the Mets won, the Mets are winning, how might this set them up for the next few games?" It's "what about the rest of the season?" or "how will this affect next year?" We all do that to some extent, I suppose. Specifically, Martino's showing himself to be a tool. WTF does last year's record have to do with this year, other than yeah, you never know if a team can keep it up? If this were the same roster and manager and GM, it might be relevant. It isn't so it's not. It's also sad that these guys (the Martinos, et al) have to rush to their default judgment that the Mets suck as a rule, thus you, gentle reader, should not be fooled. Fooled by what? Does Martino have a handle on the future that nobody else does? He can offer an informed opinion from watching the Mets every day. So can I. So can you. Other than a credential dangling around his neck, thus giving him entree to ask players inane questions after games, I'm not gleaning anything particularly insightful from him, certainly not, "hey, Mets fans, your team hasn't clinched a pennant." Well who the fuck thought it did?