Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Grand Central Contributor
Posted


Edgy MD wrote:
Edgy MD wrote:
yea, too much. banishing a team for having a bad season is fairly harsh

If you disagree, that's fine. But pretending you haven't read what I typed is what's maddening.


no, I didn't pretend I didn't read it, i dismissed it and stated my opinion that I don't see any benefit to it, and then when pressed I explained why I don't think what you said is a benefit.

I don't think we don't use language the same way.


I've suspected as much for years.

Frayed Knot wrote:
they're not being denied an open market, they're being denied fair market worth.


A free and open market is what determines fair worth.
Arbitrary numbers that lay down specific caps & floors, or schemes that fix payrolls to a certain percentage of revenues, are what skew it.


so does revenue sharing, luxury taxes, and a portion of revenue coming from TV contracts. I think salary ranges would, at least for the foreseeable future, result in the players as a whole making more money. But there are clearly other options.

Like maybe putting minor leaguers in the union and actually paying them.


  • Replies 212
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 months later...
Posted


Lefty Specialist wrote:
Ashie62 wrote:
Nobody wants a gamble on Tim Lincecum?


Wow, had no idea he was still out there. It all fell apart so fast for him.

Reportedly close to signing with the Angels.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...