Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

The Catbyrdak's Seat  

10 members have voted

  1. 1. The Catbyrdak's Seat

    • Robert Carson
      0
    • Josh Edgin
      5
    • Daniel Ray Herrera
      4
    • Chuck James
      1
    • C.J. Nitkowski
      0
    • Garrett Olson
      0
    • Nobody
      0


Recommended Posts

Posted


With Byrdak down, the Mets are sorting through journeymen, guys not thought of as lefty-dominant, guys up from A-ball, guys who've been pitching in Korea, searching for a southpaw to round out the pen.

People joke about the job market lefties, but while none of these guys appear to be an obvious major leaguer on his own merits, one of them will likely get a uniform on April 4.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


I went with Josh Edgy. They mentioned in the broadcast yesterday that his chances are being taken so seriously they issued him a respectable jersey number -- 54 -- rather than the No. 87 he had when he arrived at camp.

I kinda see he's got a chance to be a Joe Smith type, perhaps limited overall value but a role to play regardless. You don;t necessarily need a whole lot of experience for that.

Besides, the others are none too impressive. It doesn't appear they believe much in Hererra, James has been poor this spring, Olson's sort of a slowball expert rather than a deceptive-delivery guy.


Posted


It sure seemed that Alderson believed in Herrera last September, openly contrasting the relief of going into camp in 2012 with two knowns (Byrdak and Herrera) with the question mark camp of 2011.

I guess I'm going with Edgin too, but I'd like to find out what changed their attitude about Danny Ray.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


Edgy DC wrote:
It sure seemed that Alderson believed in Herrera last September, openly contrasting the relief of going into camp in 2012 with two knowns (Byrdak and Herrera) with the question mark camp of 2011.

I guess I'm going with Edgin too, but I'd like to find out what changed their attitude about Danny Ray.


#40man

Yeah, he had to have believed in him at least a little bit. K-Rod was basically salary dump, but it'd be silly to take pure crap over crap that you might kinda like. And he pitched well so it seems weird they'd have suddenly soured on him.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...