Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Memories of Joaquin Arias


Guest Edgy DC

Recommended Posts

Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Claimed on waivers today by the Royals.

This closes the books on Lastings Milledge. It also, novelty-wise, puts Sandy Alderson in a defecit position, player-procurment-wise.

Adios, Arias. Hope you get a share of the Rangers post-season change.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


He came into this organization with me calling him Alex. He's going out that way.


Posted


Can have a nice chat sometime with Jeff Kent about being on a team that was headed to the World Series and, then whamo, being on the Mets (though Joaq-Ar was DFA'd before heading to DFW).

Jerry decided he was an outfielder despite his never having been an outfielder.


Guest themetfairy
Guests
Posted




See that swing?

See the ball at Joaquin's ankles?

That's how I remember him.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Jerry thinks any fool that can play the infield can play the outfield. And any fool that can't play the outfield certainly can't be trusted in the infield. Maddening.

Involved in a rare number-for-number trade where he took the uniform number of the guy he was traded for.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Valadius wrote:
Joaquin, not Alex.


That's funny. I saw the header and thought it was Joaquin too, but he didn't make a big enough impression on me to be sure I was right. And that pretty much says it all, doesn't it?

Here's something: It frees up No. 12 if we wanna bring back Willy or even Mazzilli as manager.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Or Stoins.

The effect of number-for-number trades is to subliminally tell the world, "Well, that chump isn't coming back."


Posted


From being traded for Alex Rodriguez, to being traded for Jeff Francoeur, to being claimed on waivers.
Not exactly an upward trending career path.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


My best memory of him is that he got rid of Francoeur.

Also, the number 12 reminds me that I made a fool of myself on the third question of beer money, way back in like April, and it hasn't aired yet.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


So, the Mets win the Milledge trade easily on WAR, but it all depends on what a WAR unit is worth, because they paid significantly for their victory.

PlayerYearWAR$Mil.War/$MilPlayerYearWAR$Mil.War/$Mil
Milledge20080.3$0.4030.745Church20081.6$2.0000.80
Schneider20081.5$3.5000.43
Milledge20090.4$0.4520.885Church20090.6$1.4000.43
Schneider20090.4$4.9000.08
Francoeur20090.8$1.6880.47
Milledge20100.7$0.4521.549Francoeur20100.1$4.0000.03
Arias2010-0.3$0.067-4.48
Total1.41.30651.072Total5.017.48750.29


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Ceetar wrote:
My best memory of him is that he got rid of Francoeur.

Also, the number 12 reminds me that I made a fool of myself on the third question of beer money, way back in like April, and it hasn't aired yet.


Tell us more.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...