From the same rag, believe this all to be true because Jim has seen it with his own eyes. ] Trading Reyes for Santana still makes sense Jim Baumbach In the days after the Mets' historic collapse I advocated trading Jose Reyes for Johan Santana - and I still stand by that move, even though the Mets clearly don't agree. But if I'm the Yankees, I wouldn't give up Joba Chamberlain or Phil Hughes for Santana. They're untouchables, to me. Is it a double standard to trade Reyes, but not Chamberlain and Hughes? Not when you consider the different situations the Mets and Yankees are in, and what Santana represents. Santana is more valuable to the Mets because of their enormous need for a top-of-the-rotation starter, and just imagine how dominant he'd be in the National League with half his starts at Shea Stadium (albeit, for one more season). Yes, the Yankees need him, too. The Red Sox have complete control of the rivalry because of their pitching staff, and the Yankees need to start matching that soon to catch up. That is why I wouldn't trade Chamberlain or Hughes, not even for a two-time Cy Young award winner who is only 28 years old. Chamberlain is 22. Hughes is 21. There is no guarantee they will ever post the spectacular seasons that Santana had from 2004 through last year. But there's also no guarantee Santana will be just as dominant going forward. He was great last season, but not as great as the previous three years. Yet this past season we saw some serious glimpses from Chamberlain and Hughes that they have the ability and guts to both become big-time pitchers for many years to come. As good as Santana is, the Yankees can't give these guys up. Even if it means letting Santana go - gasp! - to Boston. That's probably the scariest proposition of this strategy for the Yankees, the idea of Santana joining Josh Beckett in the Red Sox rotation for years to come. But the Yankees have to trust their belief that what they saw from Chamberlain and Hughes this past season was not a fluke. Going forward these are the guys that will anchor their staff, and there is no doubt they can be as good as any pitcher in the majors. In the interest of full disclosure, I feel it's important for me to state that I've always been somebody who doesn't put as much stock in prospects as others. I've always been a big believer in trading prospects for known quantities, because it's rare when prospects meet the hype they receive. (Look up the Mets' Generation K on Wikipedia for proof of that. ) But I don't consider Chamberlain and Hughes can't-miss prospects anymore. They're major league pitchers now. We're not going by how scouts describe them, or trying to take their minor league stats and project how that translates to the majors. We've seen they have the ability to do it here. So if I'm the Yankees, trade away Alan Horne, Jose Tabata and Austin Jackson for Santana. And don't let Melky Cabrera stand in the way, either. I think I would even be willing to trade Ian Kennedy, if only because the Yankees can afford to with Chamberlain and Hughes ready to stay in the rotation. As for the Mets, I keep going back to this question: If they were starting a team today, who would they rather have, Reyes or Santana. If your answer is Reyes, fine. But I'm going with Santana. more in /sports Copyright � 2007, Newsday Inc.